Why Rome fell is one of the most common and questions asked in history classes worldwide. But it turns out that it wasn't one sole thing that caused Rome falling, there were many different things. I will be focusing on 3 today, which are disease, poor leadership/finances, and outside attacks. Are you ready for the blogging experience that will last you a lifetime?
Sickness was commonly rampant in Roman times. Although sanitation in ancient Rome is considered good relative to the technology available to produce it, there were still many things that were not sanitary, like the sponges used in place of our modern toilet paper. Those sponges attracted a lot bacteria. Also,
malaria was common during the summer months, and STDs were spread quickly due to the immoral ways of the Romans. People often lived close together, and just about everyone capable used the public baths. What is little know is that the sick and healthy would bathe together, even though the water was not cleaned very often. Because of all this pestilence, many would die each year, and the death rate grew and grew. The economy was horrible at this point, and many people who didn't die would flee the city because of it. This was just one factor in the economic decline of rome, others were in the areas of finances and leadership. (Cartwright & Biddiss, 93)
Roman emperors at the middle/end of the first century on raised taxes for the Romans significantly. Nero, Claudius II Gothicus, and Commodus mainly were responsible, but out of those,
Commodus did the most damage. He almost completely took all of the money out of Rome's pocket by the time he was done ruling, which marked the end of Rome's line of good emperors. One significant way Rome got money was by obtaining new land, and by the time of Trajan, the Empire had reached it's limits on land and had to recede. This cost Rome a lot of money. Disease, poor leadership, and financial problems were all part of the economic downfall of Rome, but there was one final thing that settled Rome's death, and that was outside attackers kicking Rome while it was down. (Scarre, 173)
In
A.D. 284, Emperor Diocletian split Rome into the eastern and western empires. It was necessary at the time, for Rome was simply too hard to rule as a whole, but it came back to destroy them later. Once Rome split (and while it was splitting), it was attacked by the Huns, the Goths, the Visigoths, the Ostrogoths, the Franks, and the Burgundians. In 410, the leader of the Visigoths,
Alaric, took the capitol city of Rome, and the Roman Empire finally fell apart. The Empire was gone.
The Roman Empire lasted a very long time, over 400 years, but it just wasn't strong enough to deal with all of these problems. Some in America say we're on the same path, and with California's horrible financial trouble, controversially bad governing choices (as in the ridiculous school budget cuts), and disease (Oh No! The Swine Flu!), that could be quite believable. Let's just hope America learns from Rome.
Work Cited
Scarre, Christopher.
Chronicle of the Roman Emperors. Thames and Hudson Publishing, online book, 1995.
Cartwright, Frederick Fox & Biddiss, Michael D..
Disease and History. Crowell inc., online book, 1972.
Chatboard (0)